年表作成・共有サービス - pastport

This is a very long post, so I've bolded the crucial parts. First, a thank you to Nick for putting in the time to go back and forth with the devs with our queries and their justification and put together a 20 minute movie. That is far beyond the degree of communication we've gotten in any other calendar year, and it is really appreciated by me. That being said, I strongly disagree with all. Because we have run from OVR/stat upgrades we are going the management of power upgrades - we needed to do something in regards

To begin with, let us pretend we concur with the assumption that we are out of room for stat progression: okay, but EA was entirely in charge of OVR development - if they'd done a better job with it, we wouldn't be in a place where we had to find an alternate route. And even when they didn't do a good job this could not have found a path that was much better than them. It is not like this situation was difficult to see coming, or just like it did not happen last year, or even the year before. This is yet another example of EA's magnificent inability to really have a coherent long-term plan for a season.

Secondly, let's disagree with the assumption, since there's plenty of space left for stat development - all you have to do will bring back players with fosters. The fact that EA did better this year to assembles and player differentiation means that they have a ton of room left at the stat department. A +1 SPD LBs/MLBs increase or +2 RBK WRs would be super relevant at this time, and there is a massive quantity of room to increase the magnitude or scope of boosts like that over the next four weeks as even the best players have relevant stats sitting in the low 70s or even 80s or 90s. It might keep the baseline precision and distinction of these players while providing you even more interesting choices about the best way to tweak things. Or, I guesswe can jump everything straight to 99.

All 99 stats would be to"level the playing field". Look, this just makes absolutely no sense. "Level the playing field" seems like it's something associated with competitive equilibrium, but stat distributions don't have anything related to aggressive equilibrium. Aggressive equilibrium means that everybody has access to the very same players and/or the caliber of gamers, not that every player is precisely the same across each position.

It's insult to injury this season was. Every place was different in ways that made sense, and archetypes within places had quite different builds. There were plenty of lots of valid ways and interesting choices to be made. Now, there actually aren't any roster options to make: the reply to each question is"select the man with 99 in every single stat."

Check out https://www.mmoexp.com/Nfl-20/Coins.html for more details.